By Samuel Bollinger - Author - February 24, 2001 - Fort Worth, Tx. -

1. I love science. The further it advances, the more it disproves "Darwinian" evolution.
In fact, science has advanced to the point that almost all secular scientists have
completely abandoned "Darwinian" evolution in favor of "rapid mutation", "radial
symmetry", "punctuated equilibrium", or variations of this far-out theory. It is the
only explanation (in their minds) for the complete lack of fossil evidence (despite
literally millions of discovered fossils) of any specie changing into another.
There is no such thing as macro-evolution. Micro-evolution, however, is
very possible and is in fact explained in the Bible. "...all their "kinds" and all
their variations." In other words, species adapt, sometimes quite quickly.
However, a finch is still a finch (irony intended) after adapting. A lizard is
still a lizard and a monkey is still a monkey ! Charles Darwin himself
summed it up best in his "book." "Noting the abundance of fossils,
numerous transitionals must be found to prove my theory." Enough said !
Science, real science—the work that ferrets out empirical facts about the
nature that surrounds us—has been co-opted by an ancient
philosophical/religious doctrine the origins of which can be traced back to
at least 400-700 years before Christ. Known today variously as scientism,
evolutionism, metaphysical naturalism, and Darwinism, this doctrine has
been so effectively interlaced with science that it is often difficult for the
scientist, much less the layperson, to separate the two.

2. The research dealing with mans "evolution" from the apes (or to be
specious, ape-like ancestors) begins with the assumption that man did in
fact evolve from the apes. No observations or interpretations are allowed to question this
apriori assumption. What has been sought in paleo-anthropology then are the transitional
stages from ape-like animals to man. Transitional forms have proven as elusive here,
however, as between any other plants or animals. In short, the missing link remains missing.

3. Past mistakes:

a. Piltdown Man

b. Nebraska Man

c. Ramapithicus

d. Australopithecus

e. Australopithecus Afarensis..."Lucy"

f. Homo Habilis

g. Homo erectus

h. Neanderthal man

In conclusion, it seems there is no end to the speculation over the bestial ancestry of man and it would appear that
all scientific caution has been thrown to the wind. However, with today's scientific advantages and advances we will
see evolution falling farther by the wayside scientifically and advanced as fact philosophically to our children. There
is more than ample evidence for mans sudden and abrupt appearance-creation if you will-and absolutely none for a
long gradient process or evolution. It takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does creation. One is easily
proven and apparent while the other is frauds and tricks.

4. Reverse geology -- The geologic table shows that rocks are in a sequential layer from pre-cambrian upward to
the earth's crust. However, no place on earth has this sequential pattern from "oldest" to "youngest". In fact, there is
a rock in Alberta that no evolutionist will discuss without resorting to outright lying. This pre-cambrian rock is 350
miles long by 15 miles wide by 7 miles deep. How did it get to the top if it's one of the oldest. Any scientist will tell you
it's impossible to move something of this mass through the earth. Also, there are no "up-thrust" marks anywhere on
this rock. In conclusion, there is no geologic table-just a tool for "duping" innocents. Want to see even more great
examples ? Click here .

5. Paraconformity -- This describes rock layers that are missing. "Gaps" in the geologic table where one layer of
rock is on top of the other with one missing in between - sometimes 100's of millions of years without any of the
gullying or weathering generally used as an excuse for this behavior. At several places in the Baltic region, clays of
Pleistocene age rest directly on clays of cambrian age fossils - a gap of over 400 million years. Yet, in the same
region, layers can hardly be located, so similar are the two clays. More info here.

6. Oil and coal -- When the carbon-14 test was young they used to date all sorts of things. The main 2 were oil and
coal. Tests of these 2 substances using the carbon-14 method reveal them to be just several thousand (10-14)
years old, instead of the millions they were thought to be by evolutionists. After these early dates were found,
scientists stopped using it to date these substances as it threw everything out of kilter. The production rate of C-14
in the atmosphere exceeds the decay rate by about 30% When this non equilibrium data is used instead of the
unwarranted evolutionary assumption of equilibrium, computed dates of all the organic materials fall within 10,000
years. If the atmosphere really were old, by now, these two rates would be in equilibrium. Thus, the disparity in the
two rates confirms a young atmosphere. Oil, coal, natural gas, and other items evolutionists suppose are very old
have been dated by C-14. But, this should not be possible because this dating method is no good past about
50,000 years. So, the ability to date coal, oil, etc., shows these materials are recent.

7. Stasis -- This field of observation studies the fact that most animals have remained the same, despite millions of
years of time to evolve. Many fossils from older rocks, when compared to their modern counterparts, are often
identical in form. Not one type of change into another has ever been recorded, yet evolution is regarded in most
circles as fact.

8. Transitionals -- If life has always been in a state of continual transmutation from one species to another, as
evolutionists insist, then we would expect to find many fossil intermediates between all the species. However
evolutionists must explain the following gaps: non-living matter to protozoan, protozoan to metazoan, metazoan to
invertebrates, invertebrates to fish, fish to amphibians, amphibians to reptiles, reptiles to birds, reptiles to fur-
bearing quadrupeds, quadrupeds to apes and apes to man.

9. Petrified trees -- This represents an enormous enigma to evolutionists. They speak of a different kind of burial
than is going on today. They also point to a catastrophic event, rather than slow burial. Their bark remains intact,
indicating a very different method of deposition than we now currently know. This speaks of an event of enormous
power.

10. Polystratic plants -- These are fossilized plants or trees that extend through several layers of rock, oftentimes
through as many as 20 feet of rock, representing many, many years of deposition according to evolutionists.
However, there is 1 even more amazing specimen. It is a club moss extending 120 feet through several different rock
layers, representing 300-400 million years in the evolution model. Evolutionists have often passed this of as a
reburial event but this can hardly be the case if the rock comes right up against the trunk of the tree. There is
another example of this at Spirit Lake in Washington state. Check it out. Evolutionists will point to the coal and peat
deposits in Nova Scotia. These examples are no more than 5 feet tall and are in a moderately young layer of rock.
Ask them to explain the club moss in Texas over 120 feet tall!

11. Ephemeral markings -- These are marks such as ripple-marks, rain imprints,worm trails and animal tracks. In fact
one of the most amazing specimens was found by Dr. Carl Baugh at Glen Rose, Tx. A whole worm fossilized half in
and half out of the rock. When you put water on it, it even turns pink. This hard evidence flies in the face of what
evolutionists would have you believe about deposition and soft skin!! It should be totally impossible to find such a
fossil, let alone the thousands of animal tracks, rain drop patterns,etc.

12. Soil layers -- This is another huge area of concern for evolutionists - the lack of extensive soil layers in the fossil
record. With all these layers exposed for millions of years, you would expect to find numerous soil layers. Even in
extreme desert environments these should build up. Yet in the fossil record there is very scant evidence of any build-
up. Selected areas of soil layers is exactly what you would expect for the geology of a world-wide flood.

13. The first Law of Thermodynamics -- It states: There can be no creation or annihilation of mass/energy. One
form of energy can be converted into another, one state of matter can be converted into another,and there can
even be matter/energy conversions. However the total amount of matter and energy remains constant. What does
this mean? The universe could not just spring into existence by accident.

14. The Second Law of Thermodynamics -- This is my all-time favorite. To refute this law, you either have to be a
liar or ignorant of science totally. This law tells us that anything which is organized , tends with time, to become
disorganized. Any physical system left to itself will decay, or , lose energy and organization within the system.
Instead of being highly organized like our earth's system, everything tends to become gradually disorganized.
Chemical processes will reach equilibrium then become inert. In other words, this law says the increase of
information required for a life form to evolve could not happen as this increase in information by itself violates the
law. Evolutionists would have you believe in a constant increase in order strictly by chance millions of times. Not
possible!! In fact, evolutionists have cited ice cubes and bridges as an example of this law being violated. Absurd!
Both of these things reach a peak of "order", but from then on are degrading. Besides, these things are "created",
so of course they would tend to start off "ordered". Neither of these things, or anything else, can assemble itself
from raw materials.
ASIDE: Evolutionists commonly object that the Second Law applies to closed, or isolated systems, and that the Earth
is certainly not a closed system (it gets lots of raw energy from the Sun, for example). However, all systems, whether
open or closed, tend to deteriorate. For example, living organisms are open systems but they all decay and die.
Also, the universe in total is a closed system. To say that the chaos of the big bang has transformed itself into the
human brain with its 120 trillion connections is a clear violation of the Second Law.
For a very detailed explanation that answers the critics, click here.
Another great explanation here.

Update!! The Laws of Cause and Effect and the 1st and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics have been Invalidated by
Modern Science!

15. Biogenetic law -- This law has 2 provable concepts to it: (a) Life can only come from life. (b) Like kinds always
give rise to like kinds. In all the years of observing nature, scientists have never seen this law broken or violated.
Detailed explanation

16. Angular momentum -- The sun should have 700 times more angular momentum than all the planets combined.
Instead the planets have 50 times more angular momentum than the sun. What this means is that this planetary
system was not made in an evolutionary pattern by particles gravitating together.
Want a detailed explanation?

17. Poynting-Robertson Effect -- The sun acts as a giant vacuum sweeping up about 100,000 tons of inflow per day.
The sun's radiation pressure serves to push small interplanetary dust particles outward into space. If the solar
system is really billions of years old, the solar system should have been swept clean by now - yet there are billions
of particles in our solar system.

18. Magnetic Field -- Over the past 150 years, careful measurement by scientists have shown that the earth's
magnetic field decreases by half every 1400 years. Extrapolating backwards, it is shown that the earth only 10-
12,000 years ago would have been a magnetic star, totally incapable of supporting any life - even the most simple.
Please click here for a more detailed explanation. For a great abstract click here.

19. Super Novas -- When stars run out of gas they explode. During the course of the life of the galaxy there should
be a number of super nova remnants visible from earth. Accordingly, for galaxies this size, there should be 7,250
super nova remnants visible using the evolution model. In reality, there are only 205 - very much in line with the
creation model. For a much more detailed explanation, click here.

20. The Human Eye -- Darwin said that the human eye made him shudder in terms of the evolutionary process - and
rightly so. In his day almost nothing was known about the complexity and sophistication of this organ. In fact, we still
don't know everything. It is able to do 100,000 separate functions each and every day, then while you sleep, do its
own maintenance work. Truly one of the wonders of GOD. Considering the amount of complex structures that went
into the eye, as well as the highly integrated synchronization, it is difficult to understand how the evolutionists can
believe the eye came from a natural trial and error process. The eye is well known to be useless unless fully
developed. It is ridiculous to think that any organism could live, let alone develop, during the thousands of years
evolutionists say it would take to develop an eye. That's not all, however. The eye did not develop once. There are
five different types of eyes (that we know of) - man's, squids,vertebrates,arthropods, and trilobite eyes. Enough said!

21. Sea Slugs -- The sea slug is an truly impressive design that can be used to show evolution false. Sea slugs feed
on the sea anemone. What makes this so impressive is that the anemones have poison harpoons that stick out and
would paralyze anything that came in contact with it. The sea slug however, is able to put these darts inside its own
stomach to store and use for its own defense. You would have to have all of these abilities from the start or the
organism would die the 1st time it came in contact with the dart. A slow evolutionary process would have been
deadly!

22. Flight -- Insects are the only invertebrates with the ability to fly. Their flight is different from other fliers in that it
involves a sculling motion similar to rowing a boat, where other fliers use straight flapping (one exception is the
hummingbird). What makes flight so interesting for creationists is that flight did not "evolve" just one time as
evolutionists would have you believe. There are 4 different fliers in the fossil record. The odds of parallel evolution is
a statistically impossible number. The different groups are: reptiles, as represented by pterodactyls, modern birds,
mammals, as represented by the bat and flying insects. There are too many different characteristics for all of these
to come from a common ancestor.
Speaking of insects - you have got to see this.
Great article, also

23. Laetoli Footprints -- These footprints were found in the same strata as the "Lucy" bones. Johanson and other
evolutionists have claimed these were made by lucy-like animals, yet when studied by foot doctors, both secular and
non-secular, they found them to be completely human and modern. At Glen Rose, Tx., several modern human
footprints have been found inside those of dinosaurs, much like a child of today would follow along stepping into
daddy's footprints. This proves man and dinosaur were contemporary with each other until the world-wide flood.
Evolutionists are fond of say these prints have been disproven. This is an outright lie! The exact opposite is true.
They have been verified at every turn. By secular science.

24. Fossil Horse Series -- This is still taught to our children today as proof of evolution. However there are a number
of problems with this series. (a) A complete series of horses has never been found in any rock anywhere in the
world. (b) The sequence of small toes to big toed horses does not exist anywhere in the fossil record. (c) All of the
teeth found are either grazing or browsing types. There are no transitional teeth. (d) Two modern horses have been
found at the same level as that of the very earliest types. None of this proves evolution! Just the opposite! For a
much more detailed explanation, click here.

25. Vestigial Organs -- These are organs that were formerly thought by evolutionists to be remnants of our past
evolution and not needed any more. In fact, at one time, it was believed we had over 200 vestigial organs. In
actuality, all the organs have been found to have important bodily functions. This is true for the appendix also.
Doctors have quit removing it willy-nilly-, as it has been proven to be a great aid in digestion. None of this proves
evolution!

Part 2